How Trump's Plan to Seize Iran's Nuclear Fuel Would Actually Work: Ground Operation Would Target 10 Sites, Risk Thousands of Lives

Available in: 中文
2026-03-29T18:25:06.442Z·2 min read
President Trump and top defense officials are weighing whether to send ground troops into Iran to retrieve the country's highly enriched uranium. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a congressional...

The Plan

President Trump and top defense officials are weighing whether to send ground troops into Iran to retrieve the country's highly enriched uranium. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a congressional briefing: "People are going to have to go and get it."

Operation Details

Target Sites

Experts say as many as 10 locations could be targeted simultaneously:

Forces

Expert Assessment

Spencer Faragasso (Institute for Science and International Security):

"I personally think a ground operation using special forces supported by a larger force is extremely, extremely risky and ultimately infeasible."

Key Risks

  1. Multiple simultaneous targets: Sites spread across Iran, requiring coordination
  2. Troop exposure: Forces would be deep inside hostile territory
  3. Nuclear material handling: Highly enriched uranium is dangerous to transport
  4. Iranian response: Military, proxy, and asymmetric retaliation
  5. International law: Ground invasion of a sovereign nation without UN mandate
  6. Duration: Weeks-long operation with sustained risk

Timeline

Technical Challenges

Retrieving nuclear material is not like seizing conventional weapons:

Historical Parallel

The closest historical parallel would be Operation Orchard (2007 Israeli strike on Syrian nuclear reactor), but this would be vastly larger in scale — involving ground troops rather than just airstrikes.

Source: WIRED

↗ Original source · 2026-03-29T00:00:00.000Z
← Previous: Iranians Built Their Own Crowdsourced Missile Warning System as Government Fails to Protect CiviliansNext: When Satellite Data Becomes a Weapon: AI-Faked Imagery, Spoofing, and the Battle for Truth in the Gulf →
Comments0