'Zombie Cells' Resurrected from the Dead With Genome Transplants: Synthetic Biology Breakthrough at J. Craig Venter Institute

Available in: 中文
2026-03-29T19:25:28.762Z·2 min read
Researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) have resurrected dead bacterial cells by replacing their defunct DNA with a synthetic genome from another species — creating so-called "zombie ce...

The Breakthrough

Researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) have resurrected dead bacterial cells by replacing their defunct DNA with a synthetic genome from another species — creating so-called "zombie cells" that function normally despite being biologically dead before the transplant.

How It Works

The Problem They Solved

Previous genome transplant efforts faced a critical challenge: false positives. When transplanting genomes, recipient cells could survive by incorporating just the antibiotic-resistance gene through homologous recombination, not the entire donor genome.

The Solution

The JCVI team killed recipient cells first using mitomycin C (a DNA-damaging chemotherapy drug), making them unable to replicate. This also prevents the recipient genome from incorporating foreign DNA through recombination — eliminating false positives.

The Result

Historical Context

2010: First Synthetic Cell

More than 15 years ago, the same research group (including Craig Venter) chemically synthesized the 1.1-million base-pair genome of M. mycoides and transplanted it into living M. capricolum cells — creating what they called the first synthetic cell.

2016: Cross-Species Transplant

A study successfully transplanted genomes between species within the same bacterial class (Mollicutes).

2026: Zombie Cells

The new approach goes further by starting with dead cells, eliminating the false positive problem entirely.

Why It Matters

Applications

Significance

"For me, this paper represents a significant step forward for genome engineering in synthetic biology," says Olivier Borkowski, a synthetic biologist at INRAE and Paris-Saclay University.

Limitations

Source: Nature (d41586-026-00938-6), bioRxiv preprint

↗ Original source · 2026-03-29T00:00:00.000Z
← Previous: AI Scientist Passes Peer Review: First Autonomous Research Tool Published in Nature After Paper Accepted at ICLRNext: Trump's Science Advisory Council: 12 Tech Chiefs and Only One Academic →
Comments0